Chapter 4
I. Factional Conflicts Arise from Small Causes but Over Great Issues
- Small Causes Leading to Great Conflicts:
- Factional conflicts often arise from small incidents, but the conflicts themselves are about significant matters.
- Example of Syracuse: A personal conflict between two young men holding office over a love affair escalated into a broader regime revolution.
- Importance of Early Prevention:
- Aristotle emphasizes the importance of addressing small conflicts early, especially among powerful individuals, to prevent them from growing into full-scale factional conflict.
- The Beginning is Critical: Aristotle notes that small errors at the beginning can lead to much larger problems later on, comparing the beginning to “half of the whole.”
II. Factional Conflicts Among Notables Affect the Entire City
- Conflicts Among the Wealthy and Powerful:
- Factional conflicts among the notables often involve the entire city, as these influential individuals bring in larger social groups to support their cause.
- Example of Hestiaea: A conflict over an inheritance between two brothers led to broader factional strife, with one brother enlisting the poor and the other enlisting the wealthy.
- Examples of Personal Disputes Leading to Conflict:
- Delphi: A marriage-related conflict led to factional violence when one family took offense at an insult and used sacrilegious charges to justify murder.
- Mytilene: A dispute over heiresses stirred factional conflict, eventually involving Athens and resulting in war.
- Phocians: A conflict over an heiress led to the Sacred War.
- Epidamnus: A regime revolution occurred when a personal insult over marriage led to a political split.
III. Reputation and Growth of Certain Groups Lead to Regime Change
- Influence of Reputation on Regime Stability:
- Factional conflicts and regime changes occur when a part of the city (such as an official board, a class, or a military group) grows in power or reputation.
- Example of the Areopagus Council in Athens: The council gained power after the Persian Wars, making the regime stricter, but the seafaring masses who contributed to the victory at Salamis later strengthened the democracy.
- Military Victories Leading to Revolutions:
- Argos: The notables gained power after a victory in the Battle of Mantinea and attempted to overthrow the people’s rule.
- Syracuse: The people, after their success in defeating Athens, shifted the regime from oligarchy to democracy.
- Chalcis: The people, together with the notables, removed the tyrant Phoxus and took control of the regime.
- Ambracia: The people joined with attackers to expel Periander and brought the regime into their control.
- General Principle:
- Those who contribute to acquiring power—whether they are individuals, groups, or factions—often spark factional conflicts. This can happen either because they want more power or because others become jealous or envious of their success.
IV. Imbalance Between Wealth and the People as a Cause of Revolution
- Equality Between Opposing Groups:
- Regimes undergo change when opposing groups—such as the wealthy and the people—become equal in power. This leads to conflict as both groups are unwilling to submit to the other.
- Lack of a Middle Class: When there is no strong middle class to balance the two extremes, revolutions are more likely to occur.
- Virtue and Factional Conflict:
- Aristotle notes that those who are outstanding in virtue rarely engage in factional conflict because they are few in number and have less influence compared to the majority.
V. Methods of Regime Change: Force and Deceit
- Regime Change Through Force:
- Regimes may be overthrown by force either at the beginning of a revolution or later on when opposition arises.
- Compulsion: Force is used to maintain control when a regime does not have the consent of the people.
- Regime Change Through Deceit:
- Deception at the Start: Sometimes revolutions are initiated through deceit with the consent of the people, but once in power, the rulers maintain control through force.
- Example of the Four Hundred in Athens: The people were deceived by the promise of Persian support for a war against Sparta. After seizing power, the regime used force to maintain control.
- Maintaining Control by Persuasion:
- In some cases, regimes maintain their hold on power through persuasion, ruling over a willing population without needing to resort to force.
VI. Summary: Universal Causes of Factional Conflict and Revolution
- Common Causes Across All Regimes:
- Revolutions in all types of regimes arise from similar causes, such as:
- Personal disputes that escalate.
- Power imbalances between social groups.
- Disproportionate growth of certain factions.
- Deceit and manipulation to gain or hold power.
- Revolutions in all types of regimes arise from similar causes, such as:
- Force and Deceit as Key Mechanisms:
- Revolutions often involve a combination of force and deceit, depending on the circumstances and the methods used to maintain or seize power.
Conclusion: Early Intervention and Balance to Prevent Factional Conflict
In Chapter 4 of Politics, Aristotle emphasizes the importance of addressing small issues early to prevent larger conflicts. He illustrates how personal conflicts among notables can escalate into city-wide factionalism and regime change. Additionally, the reputation and power of different social groups can influence the stability of regimes. Aristotle concludes that preventing disproportionate growth of any one faction, maintaining balance between opposing groups, and ensuring a strong middle class are essential for political stability. Regimes change through a combination of force and deceit, highlighting the complexity of maintaining power and preventing revolutions.
No comments:
Post a Comment