BOOK 6 Chapter 8 Appendix

Aristotle’s Treatment of Offices in Politics VI, Chapter 8 vs. Politics IV, Chapters 14, 15, and 16

I. Introduction: The Role of Offices in Aristotle’s Political Thought

1. Offices as Essential for Governance:
   • In Politics VI, Chapter 8, Aristotle provides a detailed account of the necessary offices for the survival and good governance of a city, emphasizing how they vary depending on the size, complexity, and type of regime.
   • In Politics IV, Chapters 14, 15, and 16, Aristotle categorizes the offices into deliberative, general, and adjudicative offices, explaining their roles and functions within different regimes (democracy, oligarchy, etc.).
2. Purpose of Comparison:
   • The comparison highlights Aristotle’s holistic approach to political offices, showing how the practical division of duties in Politics VI complements the broader theoretical discussion of office categories in Politics IV.
   • It explores how the specific duties outlined in Politics VI fit within the broader categories of deliberative, general, and adjudicative offices described in Politics IV.

II. The Deliberative Offices (Politics IV, Chapter 14) vs. Deliberation in Politics VI, Chapter 8

1. Deliberative Offices in Politics IV, Chapter 14:
   • Aristotle categorizes deliberative offices as those responsible for making decisions on public matters.
   • These offices decide important matters such as war and peace, alliances, laws, and executive decisions related to public welfare.
   • Aristotle emphasizes that deliberation can take different forms depending on the regime type:
     • Democracy: Deliberation is done by the people in an assembly.
     • Oligarchy: Deliberation is done by preliminary councils or select groups.
2. Deliberative Authority in Politics VI, Chapter 8:
   • In Politics VI, Chapter 8, Aristotle references the office that convenes the authoritative element of the regime and organizes deliberation, which is essential for decision-making.
   • In democratic regimes, this office is often called a council, responsible for introducing and reviewing laws before they are submitted to the popular assembly for final approval.
   • In oligarchic regimes, the preliminary council plays a similar role but deliberation is restricted to a small group of elite citizens.
3. Comparison:
   • Both accounts recognize the importance of deliberation in governing, but Politics IV offers a theoretical framework for how deliberation is structured based on the regime, while Politics VI discusses practical considerations, such as which officials convene these deliberative bodies and how this process differs depending on the city’s size and complexity.
   • Politics VI introduces the mechanisms of deliberation, such as convening councils and creating procedures to ensure effective governance, whereas Politics IV focuses on the scope and role of deliberative bodies in political life.

III. The General Offices (Politics IV, Chapter 15) vs. the Necessary Offices in Politics VI, Chapter 8

1. General Offices in Politics IV, Chapter 15:
   • Aristotle defines general offices as those that are responsible for day-to-day administration and deal with practical tasks related to the city’s infrastructure, economy, and security.
   • General offices vary based on the regime and include:
     • Military offices: Commanders of the cavalry, infantry, and naval forces.
     • Public finance: Offices related to treasury management, market regulation, and property maintenance.
     • Maintenance of public works: Such as road-building, fortification, and ensuring public order.
2. Necessary Offices in Politics VI, Chapter 8:
   • Aristotle in Politics VI, Chapter 8 emphasizes the necessity of a wide range of practical offices:
     • Market superintendents: To oversee trade and commerce.
     • Town managers and field managers: To ensure orderliness in both urban and rural areas, maintain roads and buildings, and resolve property disputes.
     • Revenue collectors and treasurers: To manage public finances.
     • Military officials: Responsible for defending the city during peace and war, overseeing cavalry, naval forces, and other military divisions.
3. Comparison:
   • Both Politics IV and Politics VI address general offices related to public finance, infrastructure, and military organization, but Politics VI provides a detailed enumeration of the specific duties of each office, showing how these offices must function in relation to one another.
   • In Politics IV, the focus is more on the principles governing these offices based on different regime types, while Politics VI focuses on how these offices are practically implemented and combined or separated based on the city's size and resources.
   • Politics VI provides practical solutions for dealing with the burden of office-holding, such as dividing tasks between different officials to reduce resentment and improve efficiency, which is not elaborated in Politics IV.

IV. The Adjudicative Offices (Politics IV, Chapter 16) vs. Legal and Judicial Offices in Politics VI, Chapter 8

1. Adjudicative Offices in Politics IV, Chapter 16:
   • Adjudicative offices are responsible for resolving disputes, handling legal cases, and ensuring that the law is enforced justly.
   • Aristotle differentiates adjudicative offices based on the type of regime:
     • In democracies, many citizens serve as jurors, deciding legal cases.
     • In oligarchies, legal adjudication is reserved for the elite or those with a certain level of wealth.
   • There are also specialized courts for certain matters (e.g., civil cases, criminal cases, and disputes over contracts or property).
2. Judicial and Legal Offices in Politics VI, Chapter 8:
   • Politics VI outlines specific offices responsible for legal administration:
     • Offices that oversee the registration of private agreements and judicial decisions, ensuring that legal processes are properly documented.
     • Offices responsible for enforcing judgments and guarding prisoners.
     • Aristotle emphasizes the need to divide legal responsibilities (e.g., separating the offices that determine guilt from those that enforce punishment to reduce public resentment).
3. Comparison:
   • While Politics IV provides a framework for the adjudicative function across regimes (e.g., who can serve as judges or jurors), Politics VI is concerned with practical governance, especially in the management of legal records and enforcement.
   • Both texts stress the importance of judicial offices in maintaining order and justice, but Politics VI is more focused on the division of duties to reduce resentment and ensure efficiency in law enforcement.
   • In Politics VI, Aristotle introduces the idea of rotating officials and assigning separate tasks to reduce the odium associated with enforcing judgments, which adds a practical layer to the more theoretical discussion in Politics IV.

V. Integration of Sacred and Administrative Offices in Politics VI, Chapter 8 vs. General Categories in Politics IV

1. Sacred Offices in Politics VI, Chapter 8:
   • In Politics VI, Aristotle discusses the importance of offices connected with divine matters, such as priests and officials overseeing sacred buildings and public sacrifices.
   • These offices play a vital role in the religious life of the city, ensuring that religious obligations are fulfilled and that the city’s cultural identity is preserved.
2. Integration of Sacred Offices in Politics IV:
   • In Politics IV, Aristotle does not emphasize the sacred offices as a separate category but acknowledges that religious and civic life are intertwined in both democratic and oligarchic regimes.
   • Sacred offices are more implicitly discussed in relation to the overall governance structure, especially in terms of cultural and traditional continuity.
3. Comparison:
   • In Politics VI, Aristotle provides a more explicit account of the role of sacred offices, which were treated more indirectly in Politics IV.
   • The practical role of religious officials in managing public sacrifices and maintaining sacred sites is fully detailed in Politics VI, which integrates these functions into the city’s overall administration.
   • In contrast, Politics IV focuses more on the broader role of governance, with the religious element being more implicit in the discussion of public life.

VI. Conclusion: The Relationship Between Theoretical and Practical Discussions of Offices

1. Politics IV: A Theoretical Framework:
   • In Politics IV, Aristotle offers a categorical breakdown of offices according to their functions (deliberative, general, adjudicative) and how these offices fit within different regimes (democracy, oligarchy, aristocracy).
2. Politics VI: Practical Administration:
   • Politics VI provides a pragmatic approach to the administration of the city, discussing the specific roles and duties of each office and offering insights on how they can be combined or separated depending on the city’s size and resources.
3. Integration of Theory and Practice:
   • Politics VI builds on the theoretical framework of Politics IV by offering practical examples of how these offices function in real-life governance.
   • Both books work together to show how political theory informs the practical administration of a city, with Politics IV offering a conceptual structure and Politics VI providing a practical guide for organizing offices in different types of regimes.

---

Video Explanation

Video Explanation Not Yet Available.